If you’ve been using Juro for some time, you must be well aware of its strengths and weaknesses.
There’s no denying that Juro excels at basic contract management. But when your business starts to scale, or your needs become more complex, those limitations stand out.
Whether it’s the need for more advanced features, cumbersome navigation, or poor integration with other tools, these pain points can slow down your legal and sales teams. If these challenges sound familiar, it might be time to explore alternatives.
In this post, you get an understanding of the top 7 Juro alternatives designed to simplify life for legal and sales teams. We’ll cover everything from standout features to pricing so you can find the perfect match for your business without the hassle.
Let’s get started.
Why consider alternatives to Juro?
Choosing the right contract management software is key to keeping your business running smoothly. Here’s why you might want to check out some alternatives:
Limited customization: Juro’s templating and workflows are effective for standard processes, but for businesses with unique contract needs or evolving workflows, it may feel rigid and limiting.
Lack of advanced AI: Juro’s AI capabilities are somewhat basic, limited to extracting simple data like names and dates. If you need more advanced features like AI-driven contract review or deeper analytics, it might fall short.
Integration frustrations: Juro’s integrations with tools like your CRM, project management, or ERP systems aren’t seamless sometimes. It could disrupt workflows and slow your team’s productivity.
Pricing concerns: Juro’s pricing might not align with your budget, especially if you’re not utilizing all of its features. Other platforms may provide better value, offering the right balance of cost and functionality.
Scalability issues: As your business grows, so do your contract management needs. Juro may struggle to keep up with more complex workflows, making a more scalable solution a smarter long-term choice.
Feature gaps: You might find that Juro lacks critical features like advanced reporting, granular permissions, or complex approval workflows. Exploring alternatives could uncover tools that meet your specific needs more comprehensively.
How do we analyze and select these tools?
Our process for curating a list of relevant tools is pretty thorough. We reviewed 40 different contract management software options to ensure we cover all the bases. Each tool was evaluated on several crucial factors: its ease of use, integration capabilities, scalability as your business grows, and the quality of its customer support.
By thoroughly examining these aspects, we ensure that the tools we recommend aren’t just decent—they’re ideally suited to help your business operate more efficiently and effectively.
Top 7 alternatives to Juro
Here are the top 7 alternatives to Juro, each catering to specific contract management needs—whether you’re looking for AI-driven tools, more flexibility, or seamless integration with your existing systems:
- HyperStart CLM – Best for AI-driven contract management
- Ironclad – Best for powerful workflow automation
- SpotDraft – Best for startups needing streamlined contract automation
- DocuSign CLM – Best for organizations focused on electronic signature integration
- ContractSafe – Best for simplicity and ease of use
- Summize – Best for collaborative contract review and negotiation
- Conga CLM – Best for large enterprises with complex contract needs
1. HyperStart CLM
HyperStart CLM is a compelling alternative to Juro, especially for organizations looking for an AI-driven contract management solution that balances speed, user-friendliness, and affordability.
See HyperStart in action 👇
HyperStart features better than Juro
| Features | HyperStart | Juro |
|---|---|---|
| Speed and Efficiency | Achieves up to 80% faster contract turnaround times. | Significant speed improvements, but not as quantified. |
| AI Features | AI redlining, AI metadata extraction, AI drafting, AI summarizing. | AI redlining. |
| User-Centric Design | Intuitive interface that minimizes the learning curve for new users. | Steeper learning curve. |
| Integration Capabilities | Smooth integration with various business tools, enhancing workflow continuity. | Integration challenges with traditional tools, notably Microsoft Word. |
| Pricing Model | Transparent pricing with no hidden costs; all premium features included. | Potential additional costs for certain features, less transparency. |
| Overall User Experience | Enhanced productivity through comprehensive features and seamless workflows. | Limitations in customization. |
HyperStart is best suited for
HyperStart’s AI features, coupled with its ease of use, make it a top choice for B2C, B2B, funded companies, and enterprises with growing contract management needs.
HyperStart Pricing
Premium features are included in all standard plans—unlike some competitors that charge extra for advanced tools.
Choose from different pricing tiers based on your contract volume, user count, and the specific features you need.
The pricing is customized for each business, so to get an exact quote, it’s best to reach out to the HyperStart sales team directly.
HyperStart also offers a 14-day free trial, giving you plenty of time to explore the platform and see if it’s the right fit.
See what HyperStart users have to say
We took demos of around 5 CLM vendors and chose to use HyperStart. They were the only CLM vendor who had SOC2 compliance and met the criteria of around 22 parameters which we had evaluated them on.
Om Prakash Pandey
Head of Legal at LeadSquared
Michelle was our first point of contact, and she was incredibly kind and supportive. Typically, sales teams focus less on the post-signing process, but Michelle made sure the implementation was smooth and that we had a great experience.
Mayuri Jaltare
Company Secretary, Qapita
2. Ironclad
Ironclad is a platform that helps businesses manage contracts from start to finish. Whether you’re drafting, negotiating, or storing contracts, Ironclad makes the whole process smoother and faster. It’s especially useful for legal, sales, and procurement teams that deal with a lot of contracts and want to streamline their workflow.
If you’re looking for an alternative to Ironclad, several platforms offer similar contract management features with different pricing and customization options.
Key features of Ironclad
Template Library: Pre-built, customizable contract templates to speed up creation and ensure consistency.
E-Signature Integration: Seamless integration with DocuSign for secure electronic signing from any device.
Contract Repository: Centralized, searchable storage for easy contract management throughout their lifecycle.
Approval Workflows: Automated workflows route contracts to stakeholders for quick review and approval.
Pros and cons of using Ironclad
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
 Customizable to unique business needs |  Pricing is not transparent and requires custom quotes |
| Leverages AI for data insights and decision making | May be cost-prohibitive for smaller businesses |
| Establishes a system of record for contract data | Requires a strong procurement process to negotiate favorable terms |
Ironclad compared to Juro
Ironclad outperforms Juro in handling the complete contract lifecycle. It offers better workflows, superior reporting, and integrated e-signature capabilities. If you’re managing complex contracts or scaling your business, Ironclad is the better option.
3. SpotDraft
SpotDraft is a contract management platform that provides an easy-to-use and cost-effective alternative to Juro. It’s designed to simplify contract creation, negotiation, and management, making it an ideal choice for startups and small businesses seeking efficiency. SpotDraft emphasizes a user-friendly interface and smart automation to help you handle contracts with ease and effectiveness.
Key features of SpotDraft
Templates: Users can create high-volume contracts using customizable contract templates, ensuring compliance with legal standards and reducing drafting time.
Workflows: SpotDraft allows users to set up automated workflows for contract approval processes, minimizing turnaround times and business risks.
Integrations: SpotDraft can integrate with over 15 external systems, enhancing collaboration across various business functions.
Smart data capture: The platform uses AI to extract key information from contracts, facilitating better decision-making and data management.
Pros and cons of using SpotDraft
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| SpotDraft’s interface is easy to use | SpotDraft can’t generate templates on demand, and updating them takes time |
| SpotDraft’s customer support is consistently helpful and responsive | The AI features might require more manual input than expected |
| Flexible pricing model, where you only pay for what you use | The contract editor has been reported to have formatting issues |
SpotDraft compared to Juro
SpotDraft is easy to set up and faster to use compared to Juro. It offers great value for startups needing streamlined contract automation, though some users might find the AI features and contract editor less intuitive than expected.
4. DocuSign CLM
DocuSign CLM is a contract management solution designed to streamline the entire contract lifecycle, making it faster and easier.
The platform helps businesses automate tasks, manage complex workflows, and enhance compliance, ensuring everything runs smoothly from contract creation to execution. It offers advanced AI features for speeding up document reviews, integrates seamlessly with tools like Salesforce and SAP Ariba, and scales with your business needs.
If you’re exploring other options, check out some of the top DocuSign alternatives to see what other contract management solutions offer regarding features and flexibility.<p>For more detailed information on how the platform is priced, visit the blog DocuSign pricing to determine the best plan for your business.
DocuSign offers advanced AI features for speeding up document reviews, integrates seamlessly with tools like Salesforce and SAP Ariba, and scales with your business needs.
Key features of DocuSign CLM
Drag-and-drop editor: Easily create and modify workflows without needing technical skills.
Electronic forms: Capture and autofill contract details seamlessly, speeding up the contract generation process.
Merge fields: Automatically pull data from your CRM or ERP into contracts, reducing errors.
Custom workflows: Design workflows that guide contracts from review to signature and storage.
Pros and cons of using DocuSign CLM
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong integration capabilities with various tools | Lower-tier plans may lack flexibility |
| Global support for languages and currencies | Limited support for complex issues |
| Intuitive interface for easier navigation | AI features less advanced than competitors |
| Legally binding, compliant signatures | Response times for support can be slow |
DocuSign CLM compared to Juro
DocuSign CLM’s automated workflows, integration capabilities, and global support make it a robust solution for businesses with complex contract management needs. While Juro’s simpler interface might suit smaller teams, DocuSign’s flexibility and scalability are better for larger enterprises.
5. ContractSafe
ContractSafe is a simple and cost-effective solution for managing contracts. It’s perfect for businesses that want to avoid the complexities and high costs of more elaborate systems. The platform focuses on ease of use, offering features like automated reminders and mobile access.
Key features of ContractSafe
Automated reminders: Sends notifications for key dates like renewals and expirations.
Document tagging and version control: Tag contracts for easy categorization, and ensure access to the latest versions.
Mobile access: Manage contracts on the go using mobile access.
E-signature integration: Supports electronic signatures to streamline approval processes.
Pros and cons of using ContractSafe
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Quick setup in minutes without complex procedures | Documents may take longer to load |
| Transparent pricing with no hidden fees | AI features still underdeveloped |
| Unlimited users across all plans | Limited advanced features compared to competitors |
| Highly rated support team | Interface can feel too basic for power users |
ContractSafe compared to Juro
ContractSafe allows users to get started in just minutes. Its interface is designed to be user-friendly and simple, making it easy to set up and manage contracts without extensive training. While Juro is also user-friendly, its setup can be more complex and may require additional time and customization to fully integrate with existing workflows.
Juro not enough?
HyperStart CLM gives you a superior contract management experience at a fraction of the cost.
6. Summize
Summize is a groundbreaking contract lifecycle management solution that integrates directly into the tools you use every day, such as Outlook, Gmail, Teams, Slack, and Salesforce. Leveraging AI-driven automation, Summize extracts and interprets contract metadata, generates reminders, and simplifies contract review with natural language summaries.
Summize is best suited for
Mid-sized to large enterprises, businesses with high contract volumes, legal departments, and law firms.
Key features of Summize
Calendar and reminders: Keeps users on top of contract milestones with automated reminders for important dates like renewal deadlines and review periods.
Summize Word add-in: Access Summize’s features directly within Microsoft Word, including templates, summaries, and insights, streamlining the contract drafting process.
Legal front door: Centralizes legal requests, allowing users to submit requests, track progress, and access resources, boosting legal operations efficiency.
Playbooks for legal processes: Provides standardized procedures and best practices for legal processes, ensuring consistency and alignment with organizational policies.
Pros and cons of using Summize
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Quick setup with easy integrations and support. | Critical modules like contract creation and templating are below market average. |
| Intuitive and customizable for enhanced collaboration. | Contract repository scores below industry standards, with room for improvement. |
| Works well with Microsoft Teams, Word, Slack, and SharePoint. | Requires reliable internet access. |
| Offers cloud-based scalability and security. | Some AI features require further development. |
Summize compared to Juro
Summize provides free integrations with tools like Word, Teams, Outlook, and Slack, while Juro lacks such extensive integration options.
Summize charges $132/month for legal users and $65/month for business users, helping avoid extra costs, while Juro lacks detailed pricing, making cost predictions harder.
7. Conga CLM
Conga CLM is a key component of the Conga Revenue Lifecycle Cloud, designed to manage complex, enterprise-wide contract lifecycles with ease.
As part of Conga’s unified platform, Conga CLM provides a comprehensive 360° view of the contract cycle and supports 30+ languages and currencies, making it a robust, high-performance solution for optimizing revenue processes and maximizing customer lifetime value.
Conga CLM is best suited for
Midsize to mega organizations, B2B/B2C and hybrid models, legal, IT, sales, procurement, and business teams.
Key features of Conga CLM
Bulk import and data extraction: Import legacy contracts and third-party documents in bulk, with AI-powered data extraction.
Agreement hierarchy: Visualize relationships between agreements, like parent agreements and related documents, for better management and context.
Natural language search: Find contracts and clauses using powerful search capabilities for both unstructured and structured data.
Dynamic approvals and signature management: Customizable approval workflows and integration with eSignature solutions for streamlined contract execution and tracking.
Pros and cons of using Conga CLM
Conga CLM is highly suited for large enterprises that need comprehensive contract lifecycle management. Its advanced features and Salesforce integration make it ideal for businesses with complex contract needs, while Juro may be a simpler option for smaller teams.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Advanced search capabilities for quickly locating specific contracts or clauses. | The platform can be complicated for new users, leading to a steep learning curve. |
| Integration with Salesforce and other systems for a streamlined experience. | Risk of overlooking critical details due to automation. |
| Real-time commenting, notifications, and workflows improve communication. | Requires significant attention to user adoption and training. |
| Supports electronic signatures for secure contract execution. | May be cost-prohibitive for smaller businesses. |
Conga CLM compared to Juro
Conga CLM is highly suited for large enterprises that need comprehensive contract lifecycle management. Its advanced features and Salesforce integration make it ideal for businesses with complex contract needs, while Juro may be a simpler option for smaller teams.
Why is HyperStart CLM the best choice for efficient contract management
HyperStart can be set up in as little as 3 days, drastically cutting down on downtime compared to Juro’s more extended onboarding process.
HyperStart leverages advanced AI to enhance contract creation, negotiation, and tracking, achieving 99% accuracy in metadata extraction and management.
With its intuitive design, HyperStart simplifies navigation and reduces the learning curve, making it accessible to users across various departments.
Automate approval processes and contract workflows without needing technical expertise, streamlining operations.
Easily integrates with existing business systems for smooth data synchronization and workflow continuity.
Enhance Your Contract Workflow with HyperStart CLM
With advanced tools like conditional logic and external negotiation, HyperStart CLM offers an exceptional solution for your legal teams.
